No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<hr> It was deleted not because it violated any rules (which it doesn't, anyway), but because the category page was essentially the same thing. However I suppose it won't hurt anything to bring it back. What do you think? [[User:NillaCream|NillaCream]] 20:21, 3 May 2009 (UTC) |
<hr> It was deleted not because it violated any rules (which it doesn't, anyway), but because the category page was essentially the same thing. However I suppose it won't hurt anything to bring it back. What do you think? [[User:NillaCream|NillaCream]] 20:21, 3 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
*I think the page looked nicer and was easyer to use then the category page...but thats just me.--[[Special:Contributions/68.149.248.32|68.149.248.32]] 20:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC) |
*I think the page looked nicer and was easyer to use then the category page...but thats just me.--[[Special:Contributions/68.149.248.32|68.149.248.32]] 20:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
| + | *I'll bring it back, then. Thank you for your input! ^__^ [[User:NillaCream|NillaCream]] 20:47, 3 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 20:47, 3 May 2009
>< this page should be taken down. It violates DC's rules...
How does it violate the rules, exactly? So long as we don't tell which dragon comes from which egg, there has been no rule breaking. This is not a guide; it is a place to gather information about the dragons themselves, such as artist data, official descriptions, and information about the breeds--- not how to get them. NillaCream 00:53, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Also, question: Are the new breeds (the new 7: balloon, striped, sunrise/-set, whiptail, daydream, dorsal, and new pink) actually rare? If they are not, I would really appreciate it if Mr. Anon would stop editing the page to reorder them into the rare category. Thank you. NillaCream 01:39, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
this page should be brought back. this is a wiki, we do not have to follow any rules set by the DC creater.--68.149.248.32 20:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
It was deleted not because it violated any rules (which it doesn't, anyway), but because the category page was essentially the same thing. However I suppose it won't hurt anything to bring it back. What do you think? NillaCream 20:21, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think the page looked nicer and was easyer to use then the category page...but thats just me.--68.149.248.32 20:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'll bring it back, then. Thank you for your input! ^__^ NillaCream 20:47, 3 May 2009 (UTC)