Talk:Dragon types

>< this page should be taken down. It violates DC's rules...

How does it violate the rules, exactly? So long as we don't tell which dragon comes from which egg, there has been no rule breaking. This is not a guide; it is a place to gather information about the dragons themselves, such as artist data, official descriptions, and information about the breeds--- not how to get them. NillaCream 00:53, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Also, question: Are the new breeds (the new 7: balloon, striped, sunrise/-set, whiptail, daydream, dorsal, and new pink) actually rare? If they are not, I would really appreciate it if Mr. Anon would stop editing the page to reorder them into the rare category. Thank you. NillaCream 01:39, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

this page should be brought back. this is a wiki, we do not have to follow any rules set by the DC creater.--68.149.248.32 20:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * It was deleted not because it violated any rules (which it doesn't, anyway), but because the category page was essentially the same thing. However I suppose it won't hurt anything to bring it back. What do you think? NillaCream 20:21, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I think the page looked nicer and was easyer to use then the category page...but thats just me.--68.149.248.32 20:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I'll bring it back, then. Thank you for your input! ^__^ NillaCream 20:47, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

It is against DC's rules to have any kind of guide about what dragon is what. You are not allowed to say what dragons come from what eggs, what eggs have what descriptions, and what dragons are more rare than other dragons.
 * But this isnt DC. this is a separate site that falls under free use. we do not have to follow any rules set by DC.--Blood panther 02:17, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Blood panther is quite right. The DC rules are as stated: "Sorry, but you're not allowed to ask that. It ruins the surprise for yourself and possibly others. This forum is not a site "cheats guide," it is for help and site discussion." Therefore, said rule applies only to the forum, and not other arenas of use. Are you suggesting that we should then report verbal communications, IM conversations, and the like simply because someone "gave away a DC secret"? I fail to see the logic in this at all. But perhaps you can explain it to me so that I better understand...? NillaCream 18:05, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

I just thought I'd like to add, the rule of not being able to say what egg/hatchling turns into what dragon or 'how to obtain this dragon' has been abolished by the admin. The rule does not exist anymore and everyone is free to do as they please, both here and on the forum =) Bluesonic1 21:37, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

== Automated transfer of Problem Report #21544 ==

The following message was left by Anonymous via PR #21544 on 2009-04-28 04:48:16 UTC

This page violates Dragon Cave's rules. Your not allowed to say what dragons come from what eggs or hatchies...


 * "You're". :) Again, we don't. Please stop reporting this for the reasons listed above. Thank you. NillaCream 00:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

The Two-headed Dragon (Split) does not seem to be on the Dragon Types page as per today (08/01/10).

geode and bluna are unique species
Yes they have to be bred, and may even be hybrids. but they are named unique species, not alturnate forms of the same species like black and vine.

2 headed dragon is missing as well (as somone else has noted)Kotih 20:02, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

Blunas aren't on this page... It's really annoying to attempt to find the new dragons, only to find out that they're moved all over the site every single time I go to look at them.

i also saw this dragon... http://dragcave.net/view/SeDB dont know what it is


 * Hi there. That dragon is a Two-Finned Bluna dragon. A dragon someone actually removed completely from the list. I don't appreciate that as the coding on the page is rather annoying to script so either move a dragon to a different section or don't stick your fingers in there at all. I've moved the Bluna and Geode into other sections and removed Alt redirects. I shall contact the person who scripted this page to help add the Two-Headed Dragon to the page, thanks for bring that to attention.

Bluesonic1 11:36, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

Just an extra note, currently bluna is in both "new release" and "other". not really a big deal jsut wanted to make sure this was intentional.Kotih 20:02, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah I think someone was in the process of moving it around. Has it been confirmed that Electric, Canopy & Nocturne are common and the Bluna is rare? Bluesonic1 00:21, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

Split (Two-headed missing from this list)?
Hi guys! You've all done a wonderful job.

I can't help but notice the split (two-headed) dragon is missing from this list however? Can someone add it back in?

-K


 * Added it now =) Bluesonic1 10:51, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

"Other Category"
Can the Other category be split between dragons that can only be obtained through breeding (like the Geodes and Blunas) and the ones obtained through other means?

New dragon??
http://dragcave.net/view/FJqo

I never saw this dragon.

that dragon is the Nocturn dragon. they change sprites at 6:00 am and pm est. IIRC.

that is it's night time form, we list its day form on the dragon types page.Kotih 01:50, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Sprite overhaul
Since the recent sprite change, should we change the pictures on this page? I was going to do it, but didn't want to upset anyone because I wasn't sure if that was more of an admin thing >_<

Revamped!
I did a lot of work to the page.

Like? Don't like?

I just want to know so that I don't/do do it again in the future...TokinoMukou 07:25, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

New dragon... again?
http://dragcave.net/view/Gj4d

I can't find anything on the wiki, so I thought I'd bring it up.  尾藤  来  夢  00:48, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

You can find it on the Currently Being Released article, however you are not to make a new article for the new dragon/put it in the dragon types page. Votehim 02:03, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

Mod Mayhem
When wil they be Put here Screaming Dragonoid 23:13, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Important
This page should be taken down. It violate's DC's rules.TJ09 22:22, April 30, 2010 (UTC)