Talk:Dragon types

>< this page should be taken down. It violates DC's rules...

How does it violate the rules, exactly? So long as we don't tell which dragon comes from which egg, there has been no rule breaking. This is not a guide; it is a place to gather information about the dragons themselves, such as artist data, official descriptions, and information about the breeds--- not how to get them. NillaCream 00:53, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Also, question: Are the new breeds (the new 7: balloon, striped, sunrise/-set, whiptail, daydream, dorsal, and new pink) actually rare? If they are not, I would really appreciate it if Mr. Anon would stop editing the page to reorder them into the rare category. Thank you. NillaCream 01:39, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

this page should be brought back. this is a wiki, we do not have to follow any rules set by the DC creater.--68.149.248.32 20:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * It was deleted not because it violated any rules (which it doesn't, anyway), but because the category page was essentially the same thing. However I suppose it won't hurt anything to bring it back. What do you think? NillaCream 20:21, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I think the page looked nicer and was easyer to use then the category page...but thats just me.--68.149.248.32 20:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

It is against DC's rules to have any kind of guide about what dragon is what. You are not allowed to say what dragons come from what eggs, what eggs have what descriptions, and what dragons are more rare than other dragons.
 * I'll bring it back, then. Thank you for your input! ^__^ NillaCream 20:47, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * But this isnt DC. this is a separate site that falls under free use. we do not have to follow any rules set by DC.--Blood panther 02:17, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Blood panther is quite right. The DC rules are as stated: "Sorry, but you're not allowed to ask that. It ruins the surprise for yourself and possibly others. This forum is not a site "cheats guide," it is for help and site discussion." Therefore, said rule applies only to the forum, and not other arenas of use. Are you suggesting that we should then report verbal communications, IM conversations, and the like simply because someone "gave away a DC secret"? I fail to see the logic in this at all. But perhaps you can explain it to me so that I better understand...? NillaCream 18:05, 11 May 2009 (UTC)