Board Thread:DC Wiki Discussion/@comment-1738746-20151207230708/@comment-1036245-20151210045044

In summary:

Option 1. we allow anon editing. Pros: encourages users with no accounts to quickly correct grammar or other bits. Cons: makes it significantly easier for trolls/vandals/spam, higher risk of false information being edited in or correct information being altered/removed.

Option 2. we disallow anon editing. Pros: less instances of vandalism or false information. Cons: may put off users from making occasional changes, as they might not want to sign up for an account and/or don't have time to do so.

Anything I missed? For the overall benefit of the wiki, it may be best to disallow anon editing. We may get some useful corrections/grammar if we do allow anons, but it's not like a grammar problem is going to sit around for 5 years.