Thread:Bluesonic1/@comment-173.160.127.81-20181205035941/@comment-1738746-20181216032028

173.160.127.81 wrote: I feel like in cases such as this is should be made blatantly clear when a morphology listed here does NOT apply to the game's mechanics. Listing breeds as being of a morphology that they are not does confuse a lot of users, new and veteran. Even if the dragon's page lists one first, the "Dragon Sub-Types" page makes no such distinction. Why is it then that dragons with multiple affinities don't have any issues? I see this as no different to that existing mechanic, and that one is even in the Encyclopedia itself (without explanation I might add; the wiki at least has notices on the category pages to warn users).