Board Thread:DC Wiki Discussion/@comment-1738746-20190324115717/@comment-35719775-20190519150019

Commented on the bloodscale's talk page the other day, will also say here:

I'd say the infobox and categories should only be applied in the "canon" morphology, which is to say the morphology that's reflected by game mechanics. If Gilded Bloodscales would not count toward Eastern Dragons as, say, raffle entries, they shouldn't be in the Eastern category or "officially" listed as Easterns in their infobox. Players use the categories and infobox data to inform their game decisions.

Absolutely include in the article text for any of the winged Easterns that they are meant to be winged easterns. I could even go so far as supporting a wiki category for winged easterns, with a note that it's a sub-type recognized by artists though does not have gameplay effect. But until the game supports them as Easterns I don't love presenting what's technically non-canonical morphology (again, insofar as game mechanics treat it) without at the very least a note that it's non-canonical.