Board Thread:DC Wiki Discussion/@comment-35719775-20190813203008/@comment-35719775-20190904174520

Gathouria wrote: I really like that the habitat is included, but personally miss the rarity- I use it when trying to reference what is a roughly equivalent trade.

I can get why habitat is more important though, and between rares there is even high variability (copper isn't as rare as gold, etc). Not sure if there's a good way to include it, or if I'm the only one who misses it.

We do have the Dragon Rarity Guide, which is in need of cleanup and restructuring. Would that be helpful to you for this purpose? I can put some time into getting it cleaned up this week. :)

Thanks,

RinasaurusRex (talk) 17:45, September 4, 2019 (UTC)