Thread:Bluesonic1/@comment-1036245-20151009214518/@comment-1738746-20151015054156

Yeah that's the thing with wikis- many of them have their own takes on how things are done on the particular wiki because it was the admin's or admins' choice. This idea comes from the fact that many who are sysops to wikis still believe that admins are "in charge" of a wiki, when they are simply there to help and facilitate the community instead. This is why I follow the Elder Scrolls wiki, which follows Wikipedia- the Manual of Style they use is one that was developed over a huge period of time, and was contributed by hundreds if not thousands of users, and is essentially a product of one mass community consensus. I don't just style the wiki with my particular flare- I use a methodology that is the most commonly accepted on some of the largest Mediawiki-based sites.

That would be correct, but the boldening of the title is what tells us that they are referring to the article's title rather than the creature name itself. When you link to an article that you're already on, Wikia changes it to be bold, showing that you were wanting to make clear to others you were referring to the article itself but obviously can't link to it if you're already on the page so it got changed to bold text.